
3D-Printed Carbon Absorbing High-Performance Building Structure
Booth 346 at ARPA-E Summit 2025
Academic-industry collaborative, supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, developed innovative design strategy that results in prefabricated carbon absorbing building structures:
- High-performance, 3D concrete printed (3DCP), funicular floor structure with minimized mass and maximized surface area for carbon absorption;
- Floor is printed using a novel carbon absorbing concrete mixture;
- Additive manufacturing technology used to 3DCP floor modules, reducing construction waste and time of construction using prefabricated post-tensioning (PT) assembly approach;
- Reduced operational energy over building’s life cycle through thermal mass and electrified building system.
Combined strategies ensure significant reductions in environmental impacts and costs on a cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave basis.
High-Performing Building Structure
Concrete printed prefabricated funicular floor structure addresses the challenge that embodied carbon accounts for 26-57% of the total life cycle emissions from low energy buildings.
- Proposed floor solution can reduce building life cycle emissions by 60% through:
- light and resilient structure requiring less cement and steel reinforcement producing less CO2;
- carbon absorbing concrete formulation;
- reduction of construction waste and formwork;
- enhanced CO2 uptake, both in curing and over the building use phase.
- Prefabricated, 3D-printed modular floor structure has 15% less concrete volume, at least 65% more surface area, and 83% less PT reinforcement compared to a conventional post-tensioned (PT) slab (~9″ thick) – incumbent based on using the Post-Tensioning Institute Manual.
- Individual beam structural component has 4% less concrete volume, at least 58% more surface area, and 81% less rebar reinforcement compared to a conventional reinforced T-beam – incumbent based on using the American Concrete Institute Manual.
- Maximized surface area is beneficial for enhanced carbonation using carbon absorbing recipe and porous structural geometry is ideal for overall system to serve as a carbon store.
- Early-stage carbonation and flooring design of proposed system leads to enhanced mechanical performance at a fraction of the material volume and weight.
- 3DCP floor spans can significantly reduce construction times, leading to additional savings in labor costs.
- Proposed floor system solution is ideal for warehouses, distribution and fulfillment centers, data centers, parking garages and manufacturing plants.
- Reduced material footprint and optimized structural efficiency is ideal for ESG-motivated building projects and IRA-aligned procurement contracts.
Carbon Absorbing Concrete
- The 3D-printable concrete mixture replaces 30% of cement with porous biominerals, reducing CO2 emissions from raw materials in the mix design, enhancing carbonation activity, and achieving an approximate 70% reduction in total carbon emissions.
- When cured in water, the 2K carbon-absorbing formulation reached 32.4 MPa in 28 days and is projected to reach 40 MPa in 60 days. Its compressive strength is expected to improve further after CO2 curing. The 2K formulation achieved a 10.7 wt% CO2 uptake after 24 hours of prehydration and 7 days of CO2 curing.
- The concrete with porous biominerals demonstrates superior CO2 sequestration, storing up to 488.7 g of CO2 per kg of cement—a 142% increase compared to concrete without porous biominerals after seven days of carbonation.
- CO2 uptake generally decreases with sample depth and ceases beyond 20 mm in concrete without porous biominerals. In contrast, the porous biominerals-infused concrete retains 65% of its surface-layer (0–5 mm) CO2 uptake even at depths of 20–30 mm.
- The TPMS structure, with a 274% higher surface-area-to-volume ratio compared to solid specimens, promotes more uniform carbonation. Within the same surface depth range (0–10 mm), it exhibits a 122% higher CO2 uptake than the solid cast cube.
- The 3D-printed TPMS cube utilized 11% less material and exhibited a 27% higher surface-area-to-volume ratio compared to a standard cast cube, achieving a 32% higher CO2 uptake rate.
- Implementing this material design strategy in a commercial 2K large-scale robotic printing system, we successfully printed large-scale TPMS structures using the carbon-absorbing concrete.
Resilient Prefabricated Structural Design
Comprehensive design and fabrication strategy:
- Form-finding approach, Polyhedral Graphic Statics, optimizes force flow and identifies post-tensioning placement and force magnitude.
- Embedded periodic anticlastic surfaces, specifically triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS), reduce mass, maximize surface area, and provides structural stiffness and efficient distribution of stress.
- Integrated void spaces for PT cables ensure precise alignment with constant stress in cables.
- Geometric materialization generates volume while accounting for 3D-printability and fabrication considerations.
Minimized materials and maximized surface area achieved through 3DCP:
- Combined use of 3D-printing and post-tensioning technologies reduces amount of construction materials required and waste produced.
- Developed concrete 3D-printing algorithms capable of slicing complex geometries, identifying overhang locations, and generating printing toolpaths with minimal start and stops, overall optimizing designs to be self-supporting and ensuring quality.
- Efficient and effective assembly, construction, and post-tensioning protocols.
Verified structural performance through experimental testing and validated numerical modeling:
- Flexural test performed on prototype informed failure mode, ultimate load-bearing capacity, construction and post-tensioning protocal improvements, and overall design enhancement.
- Calibrated finite element (FE) model developed for post-tensioned, modular structural system, calibrated with different printable concrete mixtures.
- Material testing prototocals developed to evaluate strength of 3D-printed samples, different carbon-absorbing mix and calibrate FE model.
- Experimental tests and calibrated numerical model further inform design strategy of the floor system, overall indicating that the beam performs efficiently under the applied load with sufficient stiffness and structural integrity.
- Load-displacement graph shows that the finite element model closely follows experimental results.
Thermal Mass Performance
- item The thermal properties of multiple concrete recipes, including conductivity and specific heat capacity, characterized through Transient Plane Source method tests.
- A comparison of the thermal mass performance between a standard flat and the proposed TPMS slab design was conducted experimentally in climate-controlled chamber. The TPMS floor slab improves indoor temperature damping by 14%, reducing the need of mechanical heating and cooling and therefore reducing the operational carbon emissions.
- Coupled with natural ventilation, the 3D-printed concrete slab design acts as internal thermal mass, dampening the outdoor air temperature fluctuations, and resulting in indoor air and mean radiant temperatures within the thermal comfort zone. This in turn reduces the building heating and cooling energy load.
- The expanded surface area of the TPMS slab geometry in comparison with a flat slab, can increase the heat transfer rate between the air and the mass, without increasing the structure’s mass and embodied carbon.
- TPMS structures effectively meet space heating and cooling needs by combining natural ventilation (NV) with the proposed system, which includes the radiant system, embedded within the TPMS. The radiant system is connected to ground-source heat pumps.
- TPMS with natural ventilation (TPMS-NV), the radiant system (TPMS-Rad), and the combination of both (TPMS-NV-Rad) achieve remarkable energy savings of 12%, 29%, and 48%, respectively, compared to a baseline DoE prototype model of a flat slab with variable air volume system (VAV System) under typical Tucson, AZ weather conditions, resulting in low operational carbon emissions.
Life Cycle Assessment
- Proposed 3DCP structural system reduces 67% of GHG emissions compared to an incumbent PT concrete system.
- Emission reductions are due primarily to concrete and steel weight reduction and OPC substitution. Economy of material use also contributes to an estimated 12% operational cost savings over an incumbent PT system, with additional soft-cost and owner-cost savings made possible through shorter construction schedule.
- CO2 removal from mineralization/carbonation occurs within the product’s initial curing period; this compares favorably with cast-in-place concrete, which cannot realize full carbonation potential until building demolition.
- Deconstruction, recycling, and downcycling into aggregate incur lower impacts than incumbent system due to reduced weight and thinner cross sections.
- Additional 10-15% GHG reductions are achievable through clean energy procurement and use of zero-emission vehicles.

Project Credits
Principal Investigators
Dr. Masoud Akbarzadeh (PI), Associate Professor Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Shu Yang (co-PI), Joseph Bordogna Professor Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
Ryan Welch (co-PI), Principal, Research Director KieranTimberlake
Dr. Dorit Aviv (co-PI), Assistant Professor Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Zheng O’Neill (co-PI), Professor Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
Dr. Damon Bolhassani (co-PI), Assistant Professor, City College of New York
Dr. Peter Psarras (co-PI), Assistant Professor Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
Polyhedral Structures Laboratory, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Maximilian E. Ororbia, Postdoctoral Fellow
Hua Chai, Ph.D. Student
Yefan Zhi, Ph.D. Student
Teng Teng, Ph.D. Student
Amir Motavaselian, Design Researcher
Pouria Vakhshouri, Design Researcher
Boyu Xiao, Design Researcher
Shu Yang Group, Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Kun-Hao Yu, Postdoctoral Fellow
Dr. Yu Wang, Postdoctoral Fellow
Dr. Md Nurul Islam, Postdoctoral Fellow
Dr. Kun-Yu Wang, Postdoctoral Fellow
Dr. Yinding Chi, Postdoctoral Fellow
Sohee Nah, Ph.D. student
Thermal Architecture Lab, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Xiang (Jason) Zhang, Postdoctoral Fellow
Zherui Wang, Ph.D. Student
Advanced Building Construction Lab, Architecture, City College of New York
Dr. Fahimeh Yavartanoo, Postdoctoral Fellow
Javier Tapia, Undergraduate Researcher
Building Energy and HVAC&R Research Group, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
Youngsik Choi, Ph.D. Student