cover
1-3-floor render
1-4-FF
1-5-print
1-6-hs_segments_ed_02_pouria
1-7-hs_assembly_
1-8-
1-9-hs_loadbearing_ed_01_pouria
arpae1-2
arpae1-3
previous arrow
next arrow
cover
1-3-floor render
1-4-FF
1-5-print
1-6-hs_segments_ed_02_pouria
1-7-hs_assembly_
1-8-
1-9-hs_loadbearing_ed_01_pouria
arpae1-2
arpae1-3
previous arrow
next arrow

3D-Printed Carbon Absorbing High-Performance Building Structure

Booth 1010 at ARPA-E Summit 2024

Authors

Dr. Masoud Akbarzadeh (PI), Assistant Professor, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Dorit Aviv (co-PI), Assistant Professor, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Damon Bolhassani (co-PI), Assistant Professor, Architecture, The City College of New York
Billie Faircloth, Adjunct Professor, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Zheng O’Neil (co-PI), Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
Dr. Peter Psarras (co-PI), Assistant Professor, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
Ryan Welch (co-PI), Principal and Research Director, KieranTimberlake
Dr. Shu Yang (co-PI), Joseph Bordogna Professor, Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania

Polyhedral Structures Laboratory, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania: Dr. Maximilian E. Ororbia (Postdoctoral Fellow), Hua Chai, Yefan Zhi, Teng Teng (PhD Student), Pouria Vakhshouri (Design Researcher)

Shu Yang Group, Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania: Dr. Kun-Hao Yu (Postdoctoral Fellow), Sohee Nah (PhD student)

Thermal Architecture Lab, Architecture, University of Pennsylvania: Dr. Xiang (Jason) Zhang (Postdoctoral Fellow), Zherui Wang (Ph.D. student)

Advanced Building Construction Lab, Architecture, City College of New York: Dr. Fahimeh Yavartanoo (Postdoctoral Fellow), Javier Tapia (Undergraduate researcher)

Building Energy and HVAC&R Research Group, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University: Youngsik Choi (PhD student)

Project Date

2022-

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) of U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FOA-0002625 2625-1538).

Technology Summary

Innovative carbon-absorbing building structure

  • High-performance, prefabricated funicular floor structural system with minimized mass and reinforcement, as well as maximized surface area for enhanced carbonation.
  • Novel carbon-absorbing concrete mixture.
  • Reduced construction materials and waste and enhanced structural performance using prefabricated modular system with concrete 3D-printing and post-tensioning technologies.
  • Reduced operational energy over building’s life cycle by exploiting thermal mass and optimizing heat pumps for electrified building systems.

The combined strategies ensure significant greenhouse gas emission reduction on a cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-grave basis.

mat-0-1
mat-0-2
mat-1-Fig1_ed_01_pouria
mat-2-Fig2_ed_01_pouria
previous arrow
next arrow
mat-0-1
mat-0-2
mat-1-Fig1_ed_01_pouria
mat-2-Fig2_ed_01_pouria
previous arrow
next arrow

Efficient Structural Design

Post-tensioned funicular floor structure.

  • Prefabricated, 3D-printed modular floor structure with minimized concrete mass, ~60% less compared to conventional reinforced slabs, and maximized surface area for carbonation.
  • Funicular beams with embedded periodic anticlastic surfaces framing a compression only arch in a post-tensioned (PT) dual-banded scheme reduces amount of concrete and PT reinforcement, ~15% and ~80% less than conventional PT floors, respectively, and increases overall floor system efficiency.
  • Comprehensive design and fabrication strategy:
    1. Form-finding approach, Polyhedral Graphic Statics, optimizes force flow and identifies post-tensioning placement and force magnitude.
    2. Embedded periodic anticlastic surfaces reduce mass, maximize surface area, and provide geometric stiffness.
    3. Integrated void spaces for PT cables ensure precise alignment with constant stress in cables.
    4. Geometric materialization generates volume while accounting for 3D-printability and fabrication considerations.

Carbon-Absorbing Concrete

Strong and printable carbon capture mixture.

  • Concrete mixture replaces 30% cement with naturally abundant silica biominerals with hierarchical pores, reducing CO2 emissions and enhancing carbon sequestration efficiency; resulting in ~60% less net carbon emissions per kg of concrete.
  • 3D-printable and lightweight concrete mixture, achieving a compressive strength of ~ 40 MPa and a tensile strength of ~3 MPa, ideal for printing complex geometries.
  • Concrete mixture achieves a carbon absorption efficiency of 489 g CO2/kg of cement, 142% higher than conventional concrete.
  • 3D-printed cube with embedded triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) has a 175% greater CO2 uptake rate efficiency than a cube made from a standard concrete mix, demonstrating effectiveness of both the carbon absorbing concrete mixture and the increased geometric surface area-to-volume ratio.
  • Developed a material design strategy to print the floor structure prototype using a commercial 2K robotic printing system.
fe-1-m-model
fe-5-m-750MPa-model
2-1-TestSetup_ed_02_pouria
2-2-hs_cracks
2-3-hs_results_v2_ed_01_pouria
previous arrow
next arrow
fe-1-m-model
fe-5-m-750MPa-model
2-1-TestSetup_ed_02_pouria
2-2-hs_cracks
2-3-hs_results_v2_ed_01_pouria
previous arrow
next arrow

3D-Printed Prefabrication

Minimized materials and maximized surface area.

  • Combined use of 3D-printing and post-tensioning technologies reduces amount of construction materials required and waste produced.
  • Developed concrete 3D-printing algorithms capable of slicing complex geometries, identifying overhang locations, and generating printing toolpaths with minimal start and stops, overall optimizing designs to be self-supporting and ensuring quality.
  • Efficient and effective assembly, construction, and post-tensioning protocols.

Experimental and Numerical Testing

Test and model structural and material performance.

  • Flexural test performed on prototype informed failure mode, ultimate load-bearing capacity, construction and post-tensioning protocal improvements, and overall design enhancement.
  • Calibrated finite element (FE) model developed for post-tensioned, modular structural system, calibrated with different printable concrete mixtures.
  • Material testing prototocals developed to evaluate strength of 3D-printed samples, different carbon-absorbing mix and calibrate FE model.
  • Experimental tests and calibrated numerical model further inform design strategy of the floor system.
20230923_CFD_TPMSunit_Srf_00
cli-2-2B 3C air temperature updated copy_ed_02_pouria
cli-3-Carbon_Emission_ed_05_pouria
cli-4-4pt_test_recycle_ed_04_pouria
cli-5LCA of Structural System - Proposed Redacted (1)
cli-6-LCA of Structural System Results - Large Text_ed_01_pouria
techtomarket
previous arrow
next arrow
20230923_CFD_TPMSunit_Srf_00
cli-2-2B 3C air temperature updated copy_ed_02_pouria
cli-3-Carbon_Emission_ed_05_pouria
cli-4-4pt_test_recycle_ed_04_pouria
cli-5LCA of Structural System - Proposed Redacted (1)
cli-6-LCA of Structural System Results - Large Text_ed_01_pouria
techtomarket
previous arrow
next arrow

Thermal Mass Performance

Thermal efficiency gains and energy savings.

  • Coupled with natural ventilation, structural floor design acts as internal thermal mass, dampening outdoor air temperature fluctuations, resulting in indoor air and radiant temperatures within comfort zone; in turn, reducing building’s heating and cooling energy load.
  • Expanded surface area of TPMS geometry in comparison with a flat slab, can increase the heat transfer rate between the air and the mass, without increasing the embodied carbon of the structure.
  • The proposed HVAC system, including a ground-source heat pump and radiant system, along with TPMS structure can reduce aggregated carbon emissions by ~40% to 70% from 2030 to 2090 in regions near New York City area.
  • Possible to achieve carbon-free building HVAC operation by adopting proposed system, before 2060 in some regions, underscoring importance of electrifying building HVAC systems to reduce carbon emissions.
  • The optimal control of radiant water temperature can reduce ~19-37% energy savings by taking advantage of TPMS structure’s larger thermal mass, compared to typical rule-based controls (RBC).

Life Cycle Assessment

Life cycle stage assessment of structural system.

  • Flow of materials, energy, and labor costs for manufacturing and installation processes of incumbent and proposed structural systems determined using an integrated LCA.
  • Preliminary TEA analysis points to cost savings over incumbent systems on materials, energy, and labor for manufacturing and installation from 25% to 35%, before taking into account carbon incentives.
  • Comparative LCA screening studies show that the proposed system will likely achieve between 70% and 80% upfront- and lifecycle- GWP reductions over the incumbent system.
  • Additional savings are likely to be identified in end-of-life scenario modeling of modular system recovery, recycling, and reuse.
  • Hotspot analysis reveals concrete mix ingredients as the largest contributor to GWP, although benchtop tests of CO2 absorption suggest much of this can be offset upfront.
  • Steel sourcing identified as the second most signficant factor for upfront GWP.
  • Electricity consumption for concrete extruding, assembly, and tensioning have also been identified as key contributors to GWP, suggesting further opportunities for optimization through electricity procurement and scale-up efficiency.

Tech-to-Market

Structural system prefabrication and construction.

  • Prefabrication using concrete 3D-printing.
  • Dual-banded post-tensioned funicular beam framing.
  • Compression only, ribbed floor arch.